What is the difference between indoctrination and education

Corrected : An earlier version of this Commentary incorrectly represented the target of the parent and student rallies led by Principal Jill Bloomberg. The essay has been updated to reflect this correction. Politics have become a minefield in American schools. Just ask a principal in New York City, who is under investigation for communist-linked organizing in her school. Yes, you read that right.

She also supported her students in resisting the addition of metal detectors and helped organize school assemblies about police brutality.

Across the country, in the time of Donald Trump, educators have been declaring their opinions about our voluble president and his policies on immigration, schools, and much else.

As citizens, educators must be free to hold whatever viewpoints they wish. If school officials singled out Jill Bloomberg because of her beliefs, as she claims and they deny , they should suspend their probe and apologize profusely to her and the school.

Nor should investigators be snooping around the school to inquire whether Bloomberg or anyone else was engaging in communist activities.

That kind of fishing expedition carries eerie echoes of the s McCarthy era, when hundreds of New York City teachers lost their jobs because of actual or alleged communist affiliations. Educators have the right to speak their minds about Trump and everything else, but they should do so in a way that leaves space for students to make up their own minds. But we also need to ask whether Bloomberg was trying to impose her views on her students. When Bloomberg lent her support to students who were fighting the installation of metal detectors in her school, did she also listen to students and parents who endorsed the detectors to enhance security?

When she held school assemblies about police brutality, did she include the perspectives of community law-enforcement personnel? Not everyone thinks metal detectors are racist. But educators should be wary about imposing their beliefs on unwary teenagers. When a teacher—or a principal—wears her politics on her sleeve or her T-shirt, it makes it difficult for students to dissent from her point of view. As Americans, our two-party system has forced us to view the opposite party as the enemy.

In reality, though, we are much more similar than we are different. We all want everyone to have human rights, our kids to be safe in schools, legal immigrants to come to our country and to not die from a planet on fire.

Conservatives and liberals differ in their strategies for attaining these goals, but they ultimately want the same things. Most people also believe their social media leans left.

Is the only way to achieve the America we all want through Democratic candidates and their legislation? Are conservative points of view even necessary anymore? Conservative speakers face extreme public outcry on campuses if they try to share their views.

If liberals have all the answers, is there really any need for debate? Any political theory course will teach you debate is vital to discovering the truth. Philosophers like John Stuart Mill encourage us to challenge our beliefs constantly with opposing arguments in order to refine our beliefs and ensure they ring valid and true.

Today, we discuss our views only with those who reinforce them. Thus, the statistics offered through indoctrination are simply misrepresented, and are used only to support the beliefs being posed. Any statistics that might dispute the beliefs are not brought to attention. Education is unbiased. Indoctrination has an agenda. Difference Between Education and Indoctrination. Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects.

MLA 8 Kumar, Manisha. THINK for a while!!!!!!! Also gives you the opportunity to think on your own ,ask question where you need clarity on. If you think critically education may itself be subtle indoctrination. Education and indoctrination involve structures that guide the learner into accepting something as true. I may agree with the differences until belief of faith comes into play, where opinion of accepting a religion can go either way.

I think that indoctrination and education has similar and different parts in each of their roles… education is indeed and has indeed been proved by people, and they become facts…. Can you trust what i said? This article alone is a form of indoctrination. Is this view of the writer expressed with a reason as to why racial and cultural self-propagation are moral wrongs? This means that it varies from other teachings in one broad sense; the teachings of indoctrination should not be critically examined.

Indoctrination aims at teaching rigid beliefs, and these beliefs may not have any evidence to be true. It is generally used in context to religious beliefs where people tend to teach religious beliefs and the important thing is that, the person obtaining these beliefs cannot argue it and has to accept it the way it is. These beliefs are taught in such a manner that the student is unable to judge or evaluate these beliefs. It is generally used to teach political ideologies or religious ideologies.

The main differences between the teaching and indoctrination are: teaching is open to questions, students can always ask questions regarding the subject they are taught whereas indoctrination is like giving instructions, one needs to listen it and is supposed to follow it. In indoctrination, the student cannot question the subject matter.

Again teaching is not biased whereas the indoctrination can have a biased approach. Teaching is a positive activity in which students receive knowledge whereas indoctrination is mostly associated as a negative kind of teaching where students are expected to follow what is taught to them without making any enquiry.

Thus sometimes indoctrination is also referred as brainwashing.